"Can you hear me?" is the worst opening line of any meeting

Next comes “hang on, let me make you a co-host” and then “can you all see my slides?”. By that point two minutes are gone and every participant has started reading mail in another window. You never fully get them back.

I have seen this in trainings and in my own sessions often enough to say this: the lost minutes are not the damage. The damage happens somewhere else.

The arithmetic that is everywhere and still explains nothing

Five people times three minutes is fifteen minutes. That is in every article on the subject, and it convinces nobody who has twelve meetings a week. Fifteen minutes are recoverable somewhere.

What actually happens costs three times as much.

The start sets the norm for the whole meeting. A meeting that begins with fumbling stays unstructured. Anyone who spends the first two minutes settling roles that could have been settled beforehand will settle everything else on the fly for the next fifty too.

The participants learn. If nothing relevant ever happens in the first minutes, next time half of them arrive three minutes late. So you start later still. This is a loop that establishes itself in any team within a few weeks and that almost nobody consciously notices.

Attention is at its highest at the start. Burn the most expensive minute of the meeting on an audio problem and you do not get it back. People are in their mail by then, and the content starts against a resistance it did not have before.

The habit does not sit where you look for it

The reflex is to resolve to be better prepared next time. That does not work, because the resolution comes due at ten o’clock and the action would have to happen at five to.

A habit needs a trigger that fires at the right moment. “The meeting starts” is too late. The usable trigger lies before that, and it has to be in the calendar.

Concretely: five minutes before every meeting where you present or facilitate, there is a block. Not as an intention, as an entry. If you have recurring meetings, build the buffer into the series once and you are done. This is the same mechanism as the buffer for follow-up work after an appointment, just in the other direction.

The habit needs nothing more. The rest is procedure.

What happens in those five minutes

Check audio and output device. The most common failure is not the broken microphone but the wrong one. Bluetooth headphones that connected in the meantime, a docking station, a second monitor with its own speakers. The meeting app remembers the device from last time, and that is not always the one currently on your head.

Test screen sharing once, do not just assume the permission. On a Mac the meeting app needs screen recording permission under Privacy in System Settings. After an app update that permission can be reset, and you find out at exactly the moment you want to share. Also check which screen you are sharing if you work with two monitors.

Turn off notifications. Focus mode on a Mac, notification assistant on Windows. Not because of the distraction but because while sharing your screen private messages otherwise pop up for everyone to see. That is the mistake you make exactly once.

Force updates beforehand. Zoom and Teams always want to install their update at the moment you are in a hurry. Start the app once the day before and you do not have the problem.

Have the material open. Presentation loaded, browser tabs sorted, everything private closed. Do not go searching during the meeting.

Roles belong in the invitation, not in the first minutes

Co-host rights can be assigned in advance. In Zoom via the alternative host when you create the meeting, in Teams via the meeting options where you set who appears as presenter and who as attendee. Both take twenty seconds when you set them up and save a minute and a half in the meeting, plus the awkwardness.

Along with three questions that should be answered before the meeting:

Who facilitates. Who records the outcomes. Who decides at the end, if the group cannot agree.

The third point almost never gets settled and is the reason meetings end without a result and get repeated in two weeks.

As host you are in the room two minutes before the start. Then you are the one greeting people rather than the one still searching. As a side effect you notice whether somebody else’s technology is playing up and can fix it before it affects everyone.

The opening that keeps the energy

When the clock hits the time, you start on content. No waiting for latecomers, no round of greetings with six people, no “let’s give it another two minutes”.

Two sentences are enough: why we are here and how we will know we are done. “Today we decide whether variant A or B goes into the proposal. At the end we have the decision and who implements it.”

Wait for latecomers and you punish the punctual and reward the late. After three weeks everybody arrives late.

The bigger lever is elsewhere

So you can see the proportions: the zero-minute setup saves you two to three minutes. A meeting without a defined outcome burns sixty.

That is why the goal belongs in the invitation and not in the opening lines. One sentence in the invitation text about what should exist at the end. If that sentence will not come to you, that is the most useful information of the day, because the meeting can then usually be an email.

The clean start is the habit to begin with, because it is small and works immediately. The question of whether the meeting has to happen at all is the more uncomfortable one and the one with the greater return. Both are habits, and both only change if you tackle them one at a time instead of resolving to hold better meetings from now on.

Where it typically fails

The buffer does not get entered. Without a calendar entry the preparation does not happen on a full day, and full days are exactly the ones with the meetings on them.

The buffer gets used for one last task. Five minutes before the meeting you write one quick mail, and you are the person entering the room at 10:01 again.

Only the host prepares. If somebody else is presenting, they need the same run-up. Say so when you put someone on the agenda.

The punctual start happens once and is then abandoned, because half the group was missing the first time. That first time is exactly the point at which the team’s habit changes, or does not.

Common questions

How do I avoid technical problems at the start of an online meeting?

Put a five-minute run-up in the calendar as a fixed entry and use it to test audio, output device and screen sharing, switch off notifications and open your material. The test has to happen before you open the room, not inside it.

How do I assign co-host rights in advance?

In Zoom via the alternative host when creating the meeting, in Microsoft Teams via the meeting options where the presenter role is set. Both are part of the invitation and take under a minute.

Should I wait for late participants?

No. Waiting permanently pushes back the effective start time, because everybody adjusts to it. Start on content on time and let latecomers join without repeating anything.

What belongs in the meeting invitation?

The intended outcome in one sentence, the roles for facilitation and note-taking, and who decides in case of doubt. If the outcome cannot be phrased, the meeting is probably unnecessary.

---

Look at your calendar for next week and count the meetings where you present. The five-minute block belongs right before those. Entering it takes longer than the intention, but it also lasts longer.

If more is jammed in the team than the meeting start, a digital workplace audit looks at the whole picture: which tools do the same thing and where information gets stuck. Write to me.